My early years were spent in
public schools in South Carolina, a state with a school system that has always been ranked as among the worst. Yes, this is measured largely by the results on standardized tests, so I suppose it's possible the state's schools are excelling by some other calculation, but the people in our neighborhood who could afford it were opting for private schools out of both racism and concern for their children's educational prospects.
Despite that reputation, I got a great education. We talk a lot about curriculum and environment and tests and text books and teachers, but those are largely secondary to parents when it comes to educational outcomes. Families that value education, parents who pay more than lip service to education, tend to have children who thrive in school.
My parents were always involved in my school, Mom volunteering at every opportunity, Dad always available to help with homework. When we switched to "new math," Dad, an engineer and quite proficient in mathematics, confronted with algorithms with which he was unfamiliar, read through several chapters as I waited, then walked me through a few problems until I understood. I was, and still am, very impressed by that. Mom encouraged me to read aloud to her and my younger brother as she cooked and ironed. By the time he hit kindergarten he was already reading.
Education, my education, was a family affair, at least as important as anyone else's job in the family. This is why I got a good education.
We have struggling schools in America, most of which largely serve populations that are poor or comprised of recent immigrants or both. There are some, and in particular those who call for unproven and draconian "solutions" such as charter schools, who cry racism or classism when I point this out, asserting that I'm painting these children as incapable. It's not the children I find incapable, but rather the parents. Not all of them, of course, but when you're poor, when you're working 2 and 3 minimum wage jobs to put food on the table, it's often an insurmountable challenge to become involved in your child's education. It's impossible to make it to that bake sale or PTA meeting, let alone volunteer in the classroom, when the trade off is lost income due to missing a shift. For many that missed shift might mean losing the job entirely. How can you help your child with her homework or consult with a teacher when you don't speak the language or are so tired at the end of the day all you want to do is sleep? You can have the best curriculum in the world, the best buildings, the best books, and the best teachers, and perhaps some individual students will find a way to make that work for them, but most of us need our parents.
If you put me in charge of education budgets, I wouldn't prioritize pay increases for teachers, the latest technology, or new books, and I definitely wouldn't spend a dime more on new curricula or standardized tests. No, I would use my limited resources to encourage more parental involvement, and for those who can't afford it,
I'd pay them to be involved. There is no single thing we could do that would improve our schools more.
I was asked recently what we do at Woodland Park to prepare our children for the "next level," what we do for "kindergarten readiness." I answered that we do nothing special to prepare them. We don't need to because we are a
cooperative preschool, a self-selected population of children with actively involved parents, "privileged" children, not necessarily in an economic sense, but rather in that they have parents with at least enough income and enough time to invest several hours a week into their child's education.
Parent involvement: this is where the focus of education reform ought to be.
I put a lot of time and effort into this blog. If you'd like to support me please consider a small contribution to the cause. Thank you!
0 comments:
Post a Comment